Best Jira Time Tracking App for Project Managers

#2
Tempo Timesheets

Tempo is the most established name among Jira time tracking apps, and for large organizations, the depth shows. Timesheet approvals, cost trackers, resource planning through its companion products, and finance-grade reporting make it the default at enterprise scale.

The trade-offs are the ones you would expect from a suite: fuller capability often means additional Tempo products, per-user pricing across your instance adds up quickly, and the learning curve is real. For PM-level reporting needs, many teams end up paying for depth they never open.

Pros

Mature approval workflows

Cost and resource management ecosystem

Extensive integrations

Cons

Gets expensive at the instance scale

Full capability spans multiple products

Steeper learning curve than the PM-level needs require

See Full Comparison

#3
Clockwork by Herocoders

Clockwork's pitch is simple. Your team already moves issues and changes assignees, so let that activity become the timesheet. Timers start and stop from workflow transitions, and manual adjustment stays available for corrections.

For teams where logging discipline has failed repeatedly, automation is the honest fix. The cost of that simplicity is analytical depth. Reporting is timesheet-centric, and elapsed activity time is not the same thing as focused effort, which matters if you bill by the hour.

Pros

Automatic time capture

Generous free tier

Easy adoption

Cons

Elapsed activity time can overstate effort

Reporting depth is limited

#4
Timetracker (STAGIL)

Timetracker by STAGIL focuses on making the logging habit painless and the resulting timesheets genuinely useful. Team members log time however suits them, through a calendar view, a timeline view, directly on the issue, or with a start/stop timer, and PMs get editable, shareable timesheets that group by any field, including custom fields.

Pros

Calendar, timeline, issue, and timer logging options / Group timesheets by any custom field / Worklog tags for billing categorization / Free timesheet-compliance companion app

Cons

Charting is limited to pie and bar reports / Capacity planning features are light

#5
Worklogs (SolDevelo)

Worklogs by SolDevelo carries the Marketplace Bestseller badge in this niche, and the maturity shows. Every time an entry is stored on the issue itself, keeping the data transparent, and the reporting layer adds grouping and filtering across projects and people, saved reports you can share with stakeholders, charts, exports, and granular permissions controlling who sees whose time.

Pros

Mature and widely adopted, with a strong rating history / Saved and shareable reports with charts / Granular permission controls / Time zone and display customization for distributed teams

Cons

Estimated vs. actual comparison is not a highlighted feature ]

#6
ActivityTimeline

ActivityTimeline approaches the problem from the scheduling side. Its timeline view shows who is allocated to what and when, with workload indicators that make overallocation visible before it happens. Timesheets and tracking exist to feed that planning picture. For PMs whose main pain is allocation rather than reporting, it is a strong fit.

Pros

Best-in-class workload visualization / Planning and tracking in one view / Skill-based scheduling

Cons

Heavier setup than pure timesheet apps / Timesheet and reporting features secondary to planning

#7
Timepiece (OBSS)

OBSS Timepiece does one thing deeply: measuring how long issues spend in each status, with assignee time and transition counts alongside. For process improvement work, it is a respected specialist. The limitation is the mirror image of the timesheet tools above. There are no worklogs, no timesheets, and no billing exports, so PMs who also need effort tracking end up buying and maintaining a second app.

Pros

Deep status-time reporting / Multiple chart types / Established in the niche

Cons

No worklog or timesheet tracking at all / Second app needed for billing / Two-plugin cost stack

#8
7pace Timetracker (Appfire)

7pace built its reputation as the leading time tracker for Azure DevOps, and Appfire has now brought it to Jira. The pitch is friction removal: smart worklog suggestions, Google and Outlook calendar sync that turns meetings into loggable entries, and weekly or monthly logging views.

Pros

Calendar sync and smart worklog suggestions / Full submission and approval workflow with period locking / Billable and CapEx/OpEx categorization / Reporting API for exports

Cons

Jira Cloud only, no Data Center / New to the Jira Marketplace with a small install base / Capacity views depend on the BigPicture integration

#9
Everhour

Everhour lives outside Jira but integrates tightly, embedding timers into the Jira UI and syncing tracked time both ways. Its strength is breadth: if your team tracks time across Jira, GitHub, Asana, and client work, Everhour becomes the one place it all lands, with budgets and invoicing on top. The trade-offs are the standard external tool set. Your time data lives in a second system, sync is another thing to maintain, and Jira workflow analytics are out of scope.

Pros

Excellent multi-tool coverage / Budgets and invoicing / Clean UX

Cons

Data lives outside Jira / Sync adds a failure point / Jira-side reporting is limited

#10
Harvest

Harvest's differentiator is what happens after tracking: expenses, budgets, and client invoices generated directly from logged time. For small agencies that bill hourly, that end-to-end flow is genuinely valuable. The Jira integration covers timer-in-issue basics, but Jira is a satellite in Harvest's world rather than the center. PM reporting on Jira-side data, capacity, and flow is not what you are buying.

Pros

Built-in invoicing and expenses / Budget tracking / Simple UX

Cons

Light Jira integration / Data outside Jira / No Jira-side reporting

#11
Clockify

Clockify's unlimited free tier makes it the lowest-risk way to test whether your team will track time at all. Timers, timesheets, and basic reports cost nothing at any team size. The Jira connection is a browser-extension timer, so the integration depth mirrors Toggl's. Use it to validate the habit, then expect to graduate to a native Jira time tracking app once reporting requirements arrive.

Pros

Genuinely free at any size / Simple to start / Decent basic reports

Cons

Shallow Jira integration / No Jira-native reporting